[Serusers] Question About Different Domain in One SER Machine

Ricardo Martinez rmartinez at redvoiss.net
Mon Nov 22 17:03:21 CET 2004


Debugging with debug level 9 i found this message: 

1(15026) SIP Request:
 1(15026)  method:  <REGISTER>
 1(15026)  uri:     <sip:sip1.mydomain.com>
 1(15026)  version: <SIP/2.0>
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=1
 1(15026) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-22fceceb>; state=16
 1(15026) end of header reached, state=5
 1(15026) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
 1(15026) parse_headers: this is the first via
 1(15026) After parse_msg...
 1(15026) preparing to run routing scripts...
 1(15026) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=128
 1(15026) end of header reached, state=9
 1(15026) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [68];
uri=[sip:5555848114 at sip1.mydomain.com] 
 1(15026) DEBUG: to body [Ricardo Martinez
<sip:5555848114 at sip1.mydomain.com>
]
 1(15026) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER>
 1(15026) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 
 1(15026) DEBUG: add_param: tag=85389cb2cb0c16do0
 1(15026) end of header reached, state=29
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=256
 1(15026) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
 1(15026) found end of header
 1(15026) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
 1(15026) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=64
 1(15026) check_via_address(10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.3, 0)
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=-1
 1(15026) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on
entrance=0xffffffff
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=-1
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=60
 1(15026) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=31141, isACK=0
 1(15026) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed
 1(15026) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
 1(15026) DBG: callback type 2, id 3 entered
 1(15026) parse_headers: flags=44
 1(15026) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
 1(15026) get_record: lookup(_sip._udp.sip1.mydomain.com, 33) failed
 1(15026) sip_resolvehost: no SRV record found for sip1.mydomain.com, trying
'normal' lookup...
 1(15026) check_via_address(10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.3, 0)
 1(15026) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x402e5b38
 1(15026) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x402e5b4c
 1(15026) SER: new transaction fwd'ed
 1(15026) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil)

Is a problem with my DNS?
Hope that someone can help me.

Thanks
Ricardo 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:rmartinez at redvoiss.net]
Enviado el: Lunes, 22 de Noviembre de 2004 11:39
Para: SER Users (E-mail)
Asunto: [Serusers] Question About Different Domain in One SER Machine


Hello List.
	I'm trying to set up an enviroment where i have one SER instance (in
one machine), managing two domains.   For this i defined two domains
pointing to the same machin.  Let's say : 
	sip1.mydomain.com
	sip2.mydomain.com

both of them pointing to the 10.0.0.5  (SER).

My configuration file (ser.cfg) is something like this. 

route {
	if  ... {
		max_forward routine
	};
	
	if  ... {
		message_too_big routine
	};
	
	if (uri=="sip1.mydomain.com") {

		if (method=="REGISTER") {
			REGISTER_1 routine
		};
		
		exec 1 routine
		routing 1 routine

	} else if (uri=="sip2.mydomain.com")

		if (method=="REGISTER") {
			REGISTER_2 routine
		};
		
		exec 2 routine
		routing 2 routine

	};

        if (!t_relay()) {
                sl_reply_error();
                break;
        };

}	

route[1]
....

route[2]
....


I also have in my ser.cfg

#module domain
modparam("domain", "db_url", "/usr/local/etc/ser/domaintables")
modparam("domain", "domain_table", "domain")
modparam("domain", "domain_col", "domain")

Where my domain file is like this: 
domain(str)
sip1.mydomain.com
sip2.mydomain.com

For this setup i run SER and there is no errors in the initialization.  But
when a UA is trying to register, for any domain,  is getting  the "Too many
Hops" message.  I think is maybe a problem with my host name or something
like this.
I don't know what i'm dogin wrong.  Do i have to set up something else?,
maybe in my hosts file?.
I really hope that someone could help me.

Best regards,
Ricardo Martinez

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers




More information about the sr-users mailing list