[Serusers] Can someone (Jan, Jiri, Andrei, Bodgan, etc, etc) explain this?

[Java Rockx]

THANK YOU!!!!!!

That was my problem. I don't remember why I had that there, but it was wrong.

If you're ever in Orlando Florida I'll buy you a pint.

Thanks again,
Paul

--- Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

> On Nov 18, 2004 at 13:07, Java Rockx <javarockx at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi All.
> > 
> > I'm using dev12 with nathelper and rtpproxy. I'm interfacing with a company that uses Sonus
> > equipment to terminate to the PSTN. This company is telling me that SER is not performing to
> > RFC3261 because ACK messages are not including any "Route:" headers as stated in section
> 12.1.2.
> > 
> > Following is an email I recieved from their network engineers. Attached is also a partial
> > conversation between my SER proxy and their Sonus box. The actual problem is that Sonus
> > disconnects the call after a few seconds because of this ACK routing issue.
> > 
> 
> What's happening is you use as an alias the SONUS ip. This means ser
> will believe that the SONUS ip is his own. Because of this it will think
> the ACK uri ( user at sonus_ip) was a result of a strict router and will
> try to recover from the previous strict router. You can see the
> result :-)
> So remove alias=sonus_ip from your config. ser behaves as in RFC3261,
> it was just a little configuration error.
> 
> 
> BTW: in you onreply_route, use fix_nated_contact only for replies for
> which nat_uac_test("1") is true and not for all replies to nated
> requests (important if you run into an asymmetric UA).
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com