[Serusers] new MediaProxy release 1.1.0

[Maxim Sobolev]

You can easily get 1,000 simultaneous calls on modern single-CPU box 
with rtpproxy.

-Maxim

Ezequiel Colombo wrote:

> Hi all, i am tested the mediaproxy 1.0.1 version on a dual CPU (2.6GHz) and
> get at least 180 simultaneous calls !
> This is a good and very scalable solution to solve NAT related problems.
> 
>  TEST MEDIAPROXY.PY
>  ------------------
>  180 Simultaneous Calls
>  rtpgenerator run on same server
>  python-2.2.3-7
>  ------------------
>  SERVER:
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>  model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz
>  cpu MHz         : 2593.547
>  cache size      : 512 KB
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>  model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz
>  cpu MHz         : 2593.547
>  cache size      : 512 KB
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  MemTotal:      1031500 kB
>  SwapTotal:     2104312 kB
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  Linux 2.4.22-1.2115.nptlsmp
> 
> 
> Ezequiel Colombo
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andres" <andres at telesip.net>
> To: "Adrian Georgescu" <ag at ag-projects.com>
> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 5:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] new MediaProxy release 1.1.0
> 
> 
> 
>>Adrian Georgescu wrote:
>>
>>
>>>There is a load generator included with the distribution. If you need
>>>a benchmark that is 70 calls using G711 codec on a 1GHz PIII. This is
>>>pure orientative, use the load generator for testing you particular
>>>hardware. The idea (or the beauty of it) is that is possible to stack
>>>many boxes and distribute the load among them instead of trying to put
>>>many calls in one box (which would eventually become  another single
>>>point of failure in your infrastructure).
>>>
>>>Adrian
>>
>>Thanks Adrian,
>>
>>I will have to try MediaProxy again sometime with the load distribution
>>feature.  I tried the plain MediaProxy when it first came out last year
>>and it worked well.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>--
>>Andres
>>Network Admin
>>http://www.telesip.net
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
>