[Serusers] SER proxy behind NAT

[Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul]

On Jun 10, 2004 at 19:49, Dmitry Semyonov <dsemyonov at dins.ru> wrote:
> Andrei,
> 
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> 
> > On Jun 10, 2004 at 18:24, Dmitry Semyonov <dsemyonov at dins.ru> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Recently I've been fighting with SER running on local IP, which is 
> > > statically mapped to public one via NAT/firewall.
> > > 
> > > The problem was in SER putting local IP into Record-route field.
> > > Therefore, a public client (X-lite) was trying to send BYE message to
> > > this local IP. I used record_route_preset("<SER public IP>") in place
> > > of record_route() to solve the problem.
> > > 
> > > Does someone have any comments on the method? Are there any other
> > > solutions, (despite the obvious one to put SER into public
> > > Internet)?
> > 
> > Check also: advertised_address = <public_ip>, or on a per packet basis:
> >  set_advertised_address(<public_ip>);
> > 
> > This should use <public_ip> in Via and RR.
> 
> Thanks for the info.
> <pulic_ip> is used in Via, but not in RR with the 
> (set_)advertised_address=<public_ip>.
> So, I still have to utilize record_route_preset function.

Yes, sorry, it works only on unstable and when double record routing is
enabled (default).

It seems I forgot to backport it to stable.


Andrei