[Serusers] SER and NAT

[Klaus Darilion]

oops, sorry. I'ver never used the mediaproxy module.

klaus

Adrian Georgescu wrote:
> Function fix_contact() is available within mediaproxy.so with same 
> meaning as its nathelper.so counterpart.
> 
> Adrian
> 
>  >
>  >You have to rewrite the REGISTER message before saving the
> locations!
> 
> if (nat_uac_test("2")) {
> force_rport();
> fix_nated_contact(); # from nathelper module
> append_hf("P-Behind-NAT: Yes\r\n");
> setflag(5); #natflag
> .....
> .....
> save(location); # user with natflag set will be
> # pinged to keep NAT binding alive
> 
> 
> regards,
> klaus
> Tjapko ITS Consult at ncy wrote:
>  >/ Hello List,
> />/
> />/ In my fierce battle to overcome the NAT problem I have now running 
> SER and
> />/ Mediaproxy without any problem. Whenever any Nated EP like to call 
> to PSTN
> />/ or a non nated EP the call goes ok. Whenever I try to call from a 
> non nated
> />/ EP to a NATed EP the call does not go through.
> />/
> />/ It seems like that the destination address is not known by 
> mediaproxy so it
> />/ can't forward the call to the correct EP.
> />/
> />/ My question is whether this problem might be caused by my ser.cfg or 
> that
> />/ this is typical SIP behaviour.
> />/
> />/ In other words is it possible to call to any EP that is behind 
> Symmetric
> />/ NAT.
> 
> /
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers