[Serusers] NAT vs. NoNat authentication
Bart Van Daal
B.Vandaal at edpnet.net
Mon Jul 19 13:27:21 CEST 2004
Hi Mike,
thanks for the answer and the tip..
I can see the sipserver sending multiple '401' to the router, so
I guess the router just drops these packets because it doesn't know
what to do with them? I now have put the UA in dmz but that still
doesn't solve the problem. I'll look further.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tkachuk [mailto:mike at yes.net.ua]
> Sent: maandag 19 juli 2004 11:56
> To: Bart Van Daal
> Subject: Re[2]: [Serusers] NAT vs. NoNat authentication
>
>
>
> Hello Bart,
>
> Looks like UA not receiving 401 unauthorized message from
> SER, that's why it not resend REGISTER message with calculated digest.
> Maybe you have some troubles with NAT on 213.219.137.148?
>
> Hint: use ngrep with -W byline option (eg: ngrep -W byline port 5060 )
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
> Mike Tkachuk, ph:380-3433-47067
> YES ISP, fx:380-3433-47067
> Valova 17, mike|a|yes.net.ua
> Kolomyia, www.yes.net.ua
> Ukraine 78200 FWD: 66518
>
> 19.07.2004
> ICQ# 57698805
> MSN: mike_tkachuk|a|hotmail.com
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list