[Serusers] NAT vs. NoNat authentication

Bart Van Daal B.Vandaal at edpnet.net
Mon Jul 19 13:27:21 CEST 2004


Hi Mike,

thanks for the answer and the tip..
I can see the sipserver sending multiple '401' to the router, so 
I guess the router just drops these packets because it doesn't know
what to do with them? I now have put the UA in dmz but that still
doesn't solve the problem. I'll look further. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tkachuk [mailto:mike at yes.net.ua] 
> Sent: maandag 19 juli 2004 11:56
> To: Bart Van Daal
> Subject: Re[2]: [Serusers] NAT vs. NoNat authentication
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Bart,
> 
> Looks like UA not receiving 401 unauthorized message from 
> SER, that's why it not resend REGISTER message with calculated digest.
> Maybe you have some troubles with NAT on 213.219.137.148?
> 
> Hint: use ngrep with -W byline option (eg: ngrep -W byline port 5060 )
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> 
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
> Mike Tkachuk,     ph:380-3433-47067
> YES ISP,          fx:380-3433-47067
> Valova 17,        mike|a|yes.net.ua  
> Kolomyia,         www.yes.net.ua
> Ukraine 78200     FWD: 66518 
> 
>             19.07.2004 
>           ICQ# 57698805
>    MSN: mike_tkachuk|a|hotmail.com
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,.
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list