[Serusers] REGISTER implementation --

[Kannaiyan Natesan]

> SER is a very good SIP proxy. A proxy sets up calls, doesn't terminate
No doubt in that.

I really don't want that to be a SIP Proxy feature.
But to add as a module like NAT, RTPProxy. I hope it is clear.

The reason why it is needed:
I cannot buy bulk of phones to have a phone for every sip proxy or even to
pay too much for every additional sip uri. I feel it would be better to be
done at the server side rather than at the sip endpoint.

Asterisk needs a loads of changes to have the same implementation compared
to SER.

Kannaiyan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej at edvina.net>
To: "Jan Janak" <jan at iptel.org>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] REGISTER implementation --


> Jan Janak wrote:
>
> > What does that mean ? Do you want ser to be able to send a REGISTER
> > message to another server ? If so then there is nobody implementing
> > this.
> And I can't really understand why a SIP proxy should.
>
> SER is a very good SIP proxy. A proxy sets up calls, doesn't terminate
> them. Asterisk is not a SIP proxy, but a good PBX that can originate
> and terminate calls, both as a SIP UA Client and a SIP UA Server.
>
> /O
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>