[Serusers] SER 0.8.12, Polycom 300, and ignored CANCEL messages

[Greger V. Teigre]

Interesting, but unfortunately no. The default syn_branch setting is used in 
our config.
g-)

Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:30:42AM +0100, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>> With SER 0.8.14 and Polycom we have not seen the behavior you
>> describe. Cannot say why...
>> g-)
>
> Any chance that your configuration uses the syn_branch option, perhaps
> set to "no"?  Testing seems to indicate that this option corrects the
> problem (most likely by not using the branch tag at all).