[Serusers] SER 0.8.12, Polycom 300, and ignored CANCEL messages

Jamin W. Collins jcollins at asgardsrealm.net
Mon Dec 20 16:49:40 CET 2004


On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:30:42AM +0100, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> With SER 0.8.14 and Polycom we have not seen the behavior you describe. 
> Cannot say why...
> g-)

Any chance that your configuration uses the syn_branch option, perhaps
set to "no"?  Testing seems to indicate that this option corrects the
problem (most likely by not using the branch tag at all).

-- 
Jamin W. Collins

This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar




More information about the sr-users mailing list