[Serusers] SER 0.8.12, Polycom 300, and ignored CANCEL messages
Jamin W. Collins
jcollins at asgardsrealm.net
Mon Dec 20 16:49:40 CET 2004
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:30:42AM +0100, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> With SER 0.8.14 and Polycom we have not seen the behavior you describe.
> Cannot say why...
> g-)
Any chance that your configuration uses the syn_branch option, perhaps
set to "no"? Testing seems to indicate that this option corrects the
problem (most likely by not using the branch tag at all).
--
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
More information about the sr-users
mailing list