[Serusers] RE: mediaproxy + ser0.8.14 problem

[Dave Bath]

Ok, maybe I've been misunderstanding things a little... with the
mediaproxy module do you need to specify an outbound proxy? I was under
the impression that if you were registered against SER, and ser has
provision for detecting NAT'd clients and forwarding them off to
mediaproxy... is this correct? Or is it necessary to specify the ser IP
again as an outbound proxy?

 

Many thanks,

 

Dave

 

________________________________

From: Dave Bath 
Sent: 05 August 2004 15:39
To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: mediaproxy + ser0.8.14 problem

 

Hi all,

 

Have been trying to get media proxy to work with 0.8.14 and am not
having a huge amount of joy.  Basically the route processing seems to be
fine, but as soon as ser attempts to actually pass traffic through media
proxy it crashes out! 

 

 

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Request from RFC Private IP
Detected --> mediaproxy flagged

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: VOICEMAIL: VM user detected -->
activating VM Flag

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Caller is NAT'd (destination
offline) --> enable reply processing

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Invite received --> enabling
media proxy

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: child process 3066 exited by a
signal 11

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: core was not generated

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3186]: INFO: signal 15 received

Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3193]: INFO: signal 15 received 

 

(the same is true if the destination is online as well).  

 

I may have a problem with symmetric/asymmetric clients, but I don't
think ser should actually crash like that... does anyone have any ideas?


 

Dave

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20040805/704928ad/attachment.htm>