[Serusers] rtpproxy with parallel forking

[Richard]

Would force_rtp_proxy and unforce_rtp_proxy look into
the branch parameter for parallel forking? Maybe when
the no-answer branch calls the failure_route(), it
calls unforce_rtp_proxy and remove the rtpproxy
binding?

Is they any debug log for rtpproxy to show force and
unforce?

Thanks,
Richard

--- Richard <mypop3mail at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> When I have one phone behind NAT, rtpproxy works
> well.
> 
> However if a call goes to two phones (one behind NAT
> and one not) and ser (or more precisely cpl-c) does
> parallel forking, the call can go through but there
> is
> no voice on either direction. I have a
> modparam("cpl-c", "proxy_route", 2) and route(2)
> calls
> force_rtp_proxy().
> 
> Has anyone tried this before? Is rtpproxy capable to
> handle multiple forked calls?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail