[Serusers] rtp proxy recommendations?

[Andy Pyles]

Hi Jan,

thanks for your answer.
however, How does this solution scale?
I may have a large number of users behind NAT.

Is it possible to have a failover.. i.e. send to to rtpproxy1, if it is 
down/busy send to rtpproxy2, rtpproxy3, etc? From what I can see in the 
source code there can only be one rtpproxy at a time. Is this correct? Or 
am I missing something.


Is anyone deploying a large number of users using rtpproxy? What have you 
found?


regards,
Andy


On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jan Janak wrote:

> Most people are probably using rtpproxy.
> 
>   Jan.
> 
> On 14-04 14:27, Andy Pyles wrote:
> > 
> > Hi, I'd like to get some recommendations from other users what the best 
> > option for an rtp proxy to use. From what I have seen the options are:
> > 
> > 1.)  Ser MEDIA proxy
> > 
> > 2.)  rtpproxy
> > 
> > 3.)  asterisk ( perhaps with some slight modifications )
> > 
> > What are people using? and any insight would be helpful, as to which 
> > model seems to work the best.
> > 
> > regards,
> > Andy
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>