[Serusers] dropping call after ~15 sec "I won't send a reply for ACK!!"

Jev jev at ecad.org
Mon Sep 8 18:16:30 CEST 2003


Hi,

Adding record_route(); to my routing block solved this problem, calls 
work great now! thank you for the pointer :)


-Jev

Greg Fausak wrote:

> Howdy,
> 
> I had this problem as well.  I believe it was due to the fact
> that I didn't to record routing, and the ACK didn't get back.
> My calls lasted exactly 9 seconds.
> 
> Anyway, it is really handy to do call tracing to debug
> these sorts of things.  If you have a unix machine, tcpdump -w,
> or a windows machine can use ethereal.  You save the sniffer
> session and then process it with 'sipscenario'.  It makes a very
> easy to look at call flow, which will probably highlight the
> problem.
> 
> Of course to do sniffing you have to have a machine that sees all
> of the packets.
> 
> ---greg
> Greg Fausak
> Addaline.com, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm setting up a vega 50 BRI with ser, and I can make in/out bound 
>>calls, quality is great!
>>
>>I have a problem, when I dial from a sip phone to a land line, my call 
>>gets set up, and works great, but after approx 15 seconds it drops the 
>>call. Below is what I get in the logs from ser.
>>
>>
>> 0(29026) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: max_forwards header not found!
>> 0(29026) DEBUG: add_param: tag=4063815580
>> 0(29026) end of header reached, state=29
>> 0(29026) parse_headers: flags=256
>> 0(29026) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
>> 0(29026) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
>> 0(29026) check_self - checking if host==us: 9==9 &&  [10.0.0.11] == 
>>[10.0.0.11]
>> 0(29026) lookup(): '0868594416' Not found in usrloc
>> 0(29026) Warning: sl_send_reply: I won't send a reply for ACK!!
>> 0(29026) receive_msg: cleaning up
>>
>>
>>My Version of ser is:
>># ser -V
>>version: ser 0.8.11 (i386/freebsd)
>>flags: STATS:Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, DNS_IP_HACK, 
>>SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>>ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, 
>>MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>>@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.162.2.5 2003/08/27 16:04:35 andrei Exp $
>>main.c compiled on 11:29:10 Sep  5 2003 with gcc 2.95
>>
>>Does anyone know hwta may be going wrong here? I'm working through docs 
>>right now, but some guidance would be gratly appreciated;
>>
>>
>>My vega 50 version details:
>>Vega50(ISDN) Runtime System
>>Version: 06.02.05.1
>>Built: Aug 19 2003 12:21:46 T018
>>Serial #:0050580106bd
>>
>>Bootstrap System
>>Version: 1.09(0ws)
>>
>>ISDN Interface
>>Version: Not known
>>
>>FLASH Partition Information:
>>Partition 1: H.323 Firmware
>>             Version: 06.01.05.1
>>             Built: Jul 17 2003 12:28:38 T014
>>
>>Partition 2: SIP   Firmware            (ACTIVE)
>>             Version: 06.02.05.1
>>             Built: Aug 19 2003 12:21:46 T018
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
> 
> 





More information about the sr-users mailing list