[Serusers] Strict routing

[Jan Janak]

On 05-05 16:27, Gulherme Dal Pizzol wrote:
> Jan,
> 
> If I'm working with RFC2543 compliant phones (such as ATA) may I use loose
> routing? Will cisco ata understand lr parameter and generate an ACK/BYE
> message correctly?

  Loose routing is backwards compatible, that means RFC2543 compliant
  devices should work with RFC3261 compliant servers.

  But there are some user agents that strip the lr parameter when
  generating Route header fields (i.e. Record-Route contained lr
  parameter but Route created by the user-agent didn't). If that is your
  case then you can use modparam("rr", "enable_full_route", 1) which
  will insert ;lr=on instead of just ;lr which worked for us.

  You should give loose routig a try and if it doesn't work for any
  reason then switch back to strict routing (please report such a
  misbehavior to me).

   Jan.

> > Hello,
> >
> > is there any reason why you need strict routing ? You should use loose
> > routing instead (using record_route() function), strict routing has been
> > deprecated. If you really need strict routing that record_route_strict
> > is the right function.
> >
> >   Jan.
> >
> > On 05-05 15:46, Gulherme Dal Pizzol wrote:
> >> Fellows,
> >>
> >> I started using the cvs version of ser instead of 0.8.10. But I'm
> >> facing some doubts on strict routing vs. loose routing.
> >>
> >> In 0.8.10 I was using:
> >>
> >> addRecordRoute();
> >>
> >> rewriteFromRoute();
> >>
> >> Now in CVS version, by default strict routing is disabled, right?
> >>
> >> So, according to the rr module, I need to use record_route_strict, so
> >> I compiled rr module with it. Now, I'm using
> >>
> >> record_route_strict() instead of addRecordRoute() and loose_route()
> >> instead of
> >> rewriteFromRoute();
> >>
> >> Is this correct, or am I missing something?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >>
> >> Guilherme.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Serusers mailing list
> >> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20030505/57dad945/attachment.pgp>