[Serusers] Strict routing

[Gulherme Dal Pizzol]

Jan,

If I'm working with RFC2543 compliant phones (such as ATA) may I use loose
routing? Will cisco ata understand lr parameter and generate an ACK/BYE
message correctly?

thanks again,

Guilherme.

> Hello,
>
> is there any reason why you need strict routing ? You should use loose
> routing instead (using record_route() function), strict routing has been
> deprecated. If you really need strict routing that record_route_strict
> is the right function.
>
>   Jan.
>
> On 05-05 15:46, Gulherme Dal Pizzol wrote:
>> Fellows,
>>
>> I started using the cvs version of ser instead of 0.8.10. But I'm
>> facing some doubts on strict routing vs. loose routing.
>>
>> In 0.8.10 I was using:
>>
>> addRecordRoute();
>>
>> rewriteFromRoute();
>>
>> Now in CVS version, by default strict routing is disabled, right?
>>
>> So, according to the rr module, I need to use record_route_strict, so
>> I compiled rr module with it. Now, I'm using
>>
>> record_route_strict() instead of addRecordRoute() and loose_route()
>> instead of
>> rewriteFromRoute();
>>
>> Is this correct, or am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Guilherme.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers