[Serusers] OPTIONS method

Nils Ohlmeier nils at ohlmeier.de
Tue Mar 11 14:51:46 CET 2003

Hi Greg,

this is definatly wrong behavior of the UA because OPTIONS is not part of the 
call establishing with INVITE and should have a new CSeq.

For our own knowledge base: which UA has such a strange OPTIONS implemetation? 


On Tuesday 11 March 2003 14:40, Greg Fausak wrote:
> I am forwarding the OPTIONS message from the UA to my
> gateway (cisco 7206 / pa-vxc-2te1+ / sip) and the
> gateway is returning what looks like the answer to an
> INVITE request.  I have a pretty current gateway.  The UA
> tries over and over sending one after the other OPTIONS
> messages. I think it doesn't like the reply from the gateway.
> What is weird about the OPTIONS request is that it is
> including the established Callid.
> I tried grabbing the message in the Ser proxy and sending
> a 486 busy.
> Thanks for the help.  Most UAs do not present any problems,
> but this one has been very challenging.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20030311/e7d031d4/attachment.pgp>

More information about the sr-users mailing list