[Serusers] Re: SIP-H.323 IWF

Jan Janak jan at iptel.org
Mon Jul 28 13:40:46 CEST 2003

On 28-07 13:19, Director General: NEFACOMP wrote:
> It works now very fine. Except an annoying TAG thing that is being added to
> the SIP address in the table.

  The "TAG thing" must be there, see RFC3261

> I just changed all the params to 1 (dg_flag, log_missed_flag, ...) as per
> the config fileI received from Klauss.
> Even the aliases are fine now.
> I also added the line modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1), restarted the SER
> server and commented that line.
> I got it from the ser.cfg that I received from the great Klaus Darilion
> (Many thanks to HIM)
> What does it instruct SER to do?

  To insert ;lr=on instead of ;lr into Record-Route headers.

> Also I wish to know what these functions do: record_route() and
> loose_route(). In a simple English or French language please!!! I speak C
> but with many mistakes!!!

  record_route inserts Record-Route header into the message. loose_route
  processes Route headers, if any.


More information about the sr-users mailing list