[Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy

[Ricardo Villa]

Hi Maxim,

UA1 is the Nortel Networks SIP Client.  I did not put it behind a NAT so as
to avoid any issues.  But I followed your suggestion and swapped it for
another ATA186.  It seems to work fine now.  Made about 20 calls and all had
fine audio.  Any ideas why other UAs can have problems even though they are
not behind a NAT??

>From my observations of the rtpproxy output, I notice that when the call is
successfull I see these two lines:
addr1 filled in
addr2 filled in

But when there is no audio I only see:
addr1 filled in

By the way we mainly use ATA186s on our network but there are a handul of
others that should coexist if we were to deply the RTPProxy.

Thanks,
Ricardo



----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax at portaone.com>
To: "Ricardo Villa" <ricvil at epm.net.co>
Cc: <serdev at lists.iptel.org>; <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy


> Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is?
> Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends?
>
> -Maxim
>
> Ricardo Villa wrote:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > Sorry but I don't understand what you mean.  Ser and RTP Proxy are on a
> > machine with  IP Address=192.168.1.111.  The WAN interface of the NAT
Router
> > is 192.168.1.1.   What exactly should I do?
> >
> >
UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0
> > .15)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ricardo
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax at portaone.com>
> > To: "Ricardo Villa" <ricvil at epm.net.co>
> > Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>; <serdev at lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
> >
> >
> >
> >>Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN" interface -
> >>192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not.
> >>
> >>-Maxim
> >>
> >>Ricardo Villa wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi Maxim,
> >>>
> >>>I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3.
> >>>
> >>>The results are mixed.  Only about 40% of the calls have audio even
> >
> > though
> >
> >>>the SDP is rewritten properly.
> >>>
> >>>My test setup is like this:
> >>>
> >>>UA1(192.168.1.10) --
>
>>>SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15)
> >>>
> >>>I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files.
> >>>
> >>>1.  success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186
> >>>2.  fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186
> >>>3.  success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1
> >>>4.  fail_from_nat.txt  ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1
> >>>
> >>>Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Ricardo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax at portaone.com>
> >>>To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> >>>Cc: <serdev at lists.iptel.org>
> >>>Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM
> >>>Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Folks,
> >>>>
> >>>>Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would
> >>>>be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD,
> >>>>because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP
> >>>>proxy itself can be downloaded from:
> >>>>
> >>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/
> >>>>
> >>>>Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>>-Maxim
> >>>>P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease
> >>>>please apply the following patch:
> >>>>
> >>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Serusers mailing list
> >>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Serusers mailing list
> >>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>