[Serusers] SER on masqueraded/NAT connection

[Craig Graham]

This was the first path I took. Unfortunately, I need to talk to people who
are behind two different Intertex IX66 boxes, which do not support UPnP.

--
Dr. Craig Graham, Software Engineer
Advanced Analysis and Integration Limited, UK. http://www.aail.co.uk/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nils Ohlmeier" <nils at ohlmeier.de>
To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Cc: "Jiri Kuthan" <jiri at iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER on masqueraded/NAT connection


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> BTW it exist an UPnP implementation for iptables.
> I'm not sure but this UPnP server maybe could solve NAT traversal with the
> Windows Messenger for one or more people.
> Also i don't recommed the use of this UPnP server because i could create
very
> big security holes in you firewall.