[Serusers] About B2BUA

Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
Fri Jan 3 16:05:54 CET 2003


Hello,

ser is not a B2BUA -- it can act as proxy, redirect, transactional UAS
or registrar. These modes make a vast majority of network scenarios
happy without a need to use a B2BUA. Which is good, because B2BUAs
inherently have certain scalability, reliability and security limitations.

Is there a particular reason why you would like to use a B2BUA?

-Jiri

At 08:00 AM 1/3/2003, chang hui wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I am newbie of this field, thanks everyone help me.
>I am interesting in B2BUA, however, except some brief defination in 3261, I could not find any further defination or how to implement about B2BUA, I noticed that SER could be implemented as a B2BUA, where can I find some implementation? or where can I get any description?
>
>Koalas 
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 




More information about the sr-users mailing list