[Serusers] Sipsak Question

[Jiri Kuthan]

I think that should be definitely done and it is already on Nils's
to-do list.

-jiri

At 05:39 AM 12/30/2003, Wasik, Paul wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm having a little trouble with Sipsak when the Sipsak host is separated
>from the SER proxy by a SIP aware PIX firewall using PAT. I'm running it on
>a Windows XP machine with cygwin.
>
>I'm using "sipsak-0.8.6.exe -T -s sip:960 at 192.168.100.10". 
>
>Everything works fine if I bypass the firewall. The problem I seem to have
>is I think with the UDP port that Sipsak listens for a response on. For
>instance it sends from a UDP source port of for example 1055 to the SIP
>destination port of 5060. But it seems that Sipsak is listening on UDP port
>1054 (source port -1) for the reply. I'm running Ethereal on the same PC as
>Sipsak and I see the replies coming back correctly on port 1055. But since
>Sipsak seems to be listening on port 1054 the application does not see the
>replies from my SIP proxy. 
>
>Is there any way to control the port that sipsak listens for replies on and
>is it actually listening on UDP send port -1 for replies?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>DISCLAIMER 
>
>The information in this e-mail and its attachments may be confidential. 
>If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate
>that information. If you have recieved this e-mail in error, please notify
>us and destroy it immediately. 
>
>Whilst we try to eliminate any viruses or other harmful code or device from
>our emails or attachments, it is your responsibility to protect your system
>and we do not accept responsibility for any that may remain. We may monitor
>or access any e-mails sent to us.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/