[Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy

TeleSIP ricvil at telesip.net
Wed Dec 3 18:17:58 CET 2003


We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server.  The ser.cfg must be
configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed.

I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil at telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy


> My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the
> nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to
the
> primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)? Does
> the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the
> signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box?
>
> Thanks a ton for all the help!
>
>  - Darren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM
> To: Darren Sessions
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> It works great on RedHat.  We have it running now for about 4 months on
our
> production servers and it has never crashed
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil at telesip.net>
> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.
> >
> > I'll let you know how it goes..
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil at telesip.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
> > To: Darren Sessions
> > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > Darren,
> >
> > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8.  Maxim also put
> some
> > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile.  If you have
> better
> > luck please let us all know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andres.
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> > Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with
> Solaris
> > 9.
> > >
> > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
> > > cc  -o main.o -c main.c
> > > In file included from main.c:45:
> > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
> > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
> > > main.c: In function `main':
> > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
> > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
> > >
> > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
> > Makefile.gnu
> > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris".
> > >
> > > Any help would be appreciated! :)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >  - Darren
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
> > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions at ionosphere.net>
> > wrote:
> > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for
> Nathelper
> > > and
> > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards?
> > >
> > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they
must
> > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).
> > >
> > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to
avoid
> > >  packets with different source address than the destination of the
> intial
> > >  packet going back to the nat).
> > >
> > > >then
> > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and
> the
> > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
> > >
> > >
> > > Andrei
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > >
> >





More information about the sr-users mailing list