[Serusers] SIPPS UA

[Greg Fausak]

Thanks.  Makes sense to me :-)

---greg


> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org 
> [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Klaus Darilion
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 6:14 PM
> To: Greg Fausak; seruser at iptel.org
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] SIPPS UA
> 
> 
> The gateway receives an INVITE with a tag in the "To:" 
> header, but can't find an existing dialog (=call-id + to-tag 
> + from tag) to this INVITE. The gateway doen't treat the 
> INVITE as the beginning of a new dialog, because the TO-tag 
> is already present.
> 
> I think SIPPS should not use the to-tag recevied by ser in 
> the second INVITE, as a 4xx respond does not create a dialog.
> 
> regards,
> Klaus
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Greg Fausak [mailto:greg at august.net]
> Sent:	Tue 12.08.2003 22:33
> To:	'SER Users'
> Cc:	sip at addaline.com
> Subject:	[Serusers] SIPPS UA
> I've been trying to get the SIPPS UA working with
> My addaline.com setup.  I keep getting the error:
> SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist.
> 
> No matter what the far end is.  I am able to call this UA 
> from anywhere
> After it registers.  Anybody have any ideas?
> 
> Here is the an example call flow:
> 
http://www.addaline.com/traces/sipp_index.html

The only thing I notice that is weird is the 'Route' in the
F4 packet.

---greg
Greg Fausak

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers






_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers