[Serusers] SIPPS UA
Jan Janak
jan at iptel.org
Wed Aug 13 12:11:22 CEST 2003
Yes, Klaus is right. INVITE after digest challenge must not contain To
tag, it is a completely different request -- there is not dialog yet.
Jan.
On 13-08 01:13, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> The gateway receives an INVITE with a tag in the "To:" header, but can't find an existing dialog (=call-id + to-tag + from tag) to this INVITE. The gateway doen't treat the INVITE as the beginning of a new dialog, because the TO-tag is already present.
>
> I think SIPPS should not use the to-tag recevied by ser in the second INVITE, as a 4xx respond does not create a dialog.
>
> regards,
> Klaus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Fausak [mailto:greg at august.net]
> Sent: Tue 12.08.2003 22:33
> To: 'SER Users'
> Cc: sip at addaline.com
> Subject: [Serusers] SIPPS UA
> I've been trying to get the SIPPS UA working with
> My addaline.com setup. I keep getting the error:
> SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist.
>
> No matter what the far end is. I am able to call this UA from anywhere
> After it registers. Anybody have any ideas?
>
> Here is the an example call flow:
>
> http://www.addaline.com/traces/sipp_index.html
>
> The only thing I notice that is weird is the 'Route' in the
> F4 packet.
>
> ---greg
> Greg Fausak
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
More information about the sr-users
mailing list