[Serusers] loose_route question
Ricardo Villa
ricvil at epm.net.co
Tue Aug 5 03:37:56 CEST 2003
Hi,
I would like to understand a little bit better the "loose route" concept. I have seen 2 different configs for ser:
Sometimes the config has just:
loose_route();
...and sometimes it has:
if (loose_route()) {
t_relay();
break;
};
How exactly do these 2 differ? The README says: "The function performs loose routing as defined in RFC3261", but why would I put a t_relay() after checking for loose_route()?
What I can tell so far is that loose routing leaves the next hop in the Route header, but I don't understand which one of the above two examples actually tell SER to do that.
Thanks,
Ricardo Villa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20030804/0c20adf6/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list