[OpenSER-Docs] module docs: internal anchors

[Edson]

Hi, Daniel... Henning...

I was thinking about this ID issue... I really could'nt find an alternative,
but I have to notice that BIG tags could disencourage documents update.

To avoid this I can think only in a kind of WYSIWYG solution. I didn't find
any editor with this capability... maybe You know...

Edson

>-----Original Message-----
>From: openser-docs-bounces at lists.openser.org [mailto:openser-docs-
>bounces at lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Henning Westerholt
>Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de março de 2008 08:34
>To: openser-docs at lists.openser.org; miconda at gmail.com
>Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Docs] module docs: internal anchors
>
>On Monday 10 March 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> first, after reviewing a bit latest changes to module docs, I discovered
>> that we renamed module_user.xml to module_admin.xml, but we forgot about
>> chapter's title, it is still "User's guide". Should we replace it with
>> something more suggestive?
>
>Hi Daniel,
>
>perhaps we can name this 'Admin Guide', or 'Module Reference'? I think it
>would make sense to replace this with an entity if we change this now, to
>make further changes easier.
>
>> Second, coming to something was a bit touched in past discussions. It is
>> about adding ID attribute to sections and examples. That will help to
>> get persistent links inside a document. The issue is that we have
>> modules with same parameter name, also, perhaps modules with many
>> sections for same function (with different number of parameters), so we
>> should come up with some rules to avoid conflicts.
>>
>> A pattern can be:
>> [..]
>> In this way we ensure naming space within module. The bad might be that
>> modulename is quite long sometime, alternative will be to allocate an ID
>> per module, but we get to these IDs management, which, makes no sense,
>> in my opinion. In addition, having a clear pattern for ids, will help to
>> write the links by hart, although this is not something that important.
>>
>> Updates will be done as we go, but we should enforce for new additions.
>
>Sounds good. Some modules uses also a abbreviated form as internal prefix,
>e.g. 'ul' for usrloc. But for me its fine to use complete module name.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Henning
>
>_______________________________________________
>Openser-docs mailing list
>Openser-docs at lists.openser.org
>http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openser-docs