[OpenSER-Docs] First Clean-up Patch for Documentation
4lists at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 18:16:18 CET 2008
Just now I'm a little busy here, but I think that I can have the script
ready for tomorrow... When ready I'll send it to You...
Just a doubt: after reading Henning e-mail, are Your 'instructions' still
correct, or should I change the "<!ENTITY" tag by another thing? Henning is
this "<!ENTITY" tag ok for now, or do You have another sugestion?
>From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com]
>Sent: terça-feira, 4 de março de 2008 14:07
>Cc: 'Henning Westerholt'; openser-docs at lists.openser.org
>Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Docs] First Clean-up Patch for Documentation
>On 03/04/08 18:49, Edson wrote:
>> No... but... prevention is never a waste of time.... ;)
>so, now, what is the next step to migrate to xml?
>Edson, would you write a script to:
>- replace the sgml header with xml one
>- rename the extension from sgml to xml
>- update the references to modulename_user.xml, ..., inside the
>If you will send the script to me, I will take care of fixing broken
>tags in sgml to become compliant with xml.
>Should we rename modulename_user.xml to modulename_admin.xml?
>I will work in updating the Makefile to generate txt/html/... from xml.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerholt at 1und1.de]
>>> Sent: terça-feira, 4 de março de 2008 13:16
>>> To: Edson
>>> Cc: openser-docs at lists.openser.org
>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Docs] First Clean-up Patch for Documentation
>>> On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Edson wrote:
>>>> Danke Henning...
>>>> Please did You confirm that, at least Your modules compile correctly
>>>> README? Other developers???
>>> Hi Edson,
>>> i checked that before commiting, and at least on my svn checkout it
>>> now. Do you observed some problems on your installation?
>> Openser-docs mailing list
>> Openser-docs at lists.openser.org
More information about the sr-docs