[sr-dev] git:master:d00be11b: siptrace: Add code to trace incoming CANCEL transcations
Henning Westerholt
henningw at users.noreply.github.com
Tue Apr 9 21:26:01 CEST 2019
Module: kamailio
Branch: master
Commit: d00be11be0e5fceec5274bf3bfd02951c3752c90
URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/d00be11be0e5fceec5274bf3bfd02951c3752c90
Author: iionita <ionut-razvan.ionita at 1and1.ro>
Committer: Henning Westerholt <henningw at users.noreply.github.com>
Date: 2019-04-09T21:25:53+02:00
siptrace: Add code to trace incoming CANCEL transcations
---
Modified: src/modules/siptrace/siptrace.c
---
Diff: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/d00be11be0e5fceec5274bf3bfd02951c3752c90.diff
Patch: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/d00be11be0e5fceec5274bf3bfd02951c3752c90.patch
---
diff --git a/src/modules/siptrace/siptrace.c b/src/modules/siptrace/siptrace.c
index ae1f53d7f3..48fa9b97b4 100644
--- a/src/modules/siptrace/siptrace.c
+++ b/src/modules/siptrace/siptrace.c
@@ -1166,11 +1166,23 @@ static void trace_onreq_out(struct cell *t, int type, struct tmcb_params *ps)
return;
}
}
+
+ /* for incoming cancel this is the only play(i've found) where I have the CANCEL transaction
+ * and can register a callback for the reply */
memset(&sto, 0, sizeof(siptrace_data_t));
- if(traced_user_avp.n != 0)
- sto.avp = search_first_avp(traced_user_avp_type, traced_user_avp,
- &sto.avp_value, &sto.state);
+ if (unlikely(type == TMCB_E2ECANCEL_IN)) {
+ msg->msg_flags |= FL_SIPTRACE;
+ if(tmb.register_tmcb(msg, 0, TMCB_RESPONSE_READY, trace_onreply_out, *ps->param, 0)
+ <= 0) {
+ LM_ERR("can't register trace_onreply_out\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if(traced_user_avp.n != 0)
+ sto.avp = search_first_avp(traced_user_avp_type, traced_user_avp,
+ &sto.avp_value, &sto.state);
+ }
if((sto.avp == NULL) && trace_is_off(msg)) {
LM_DBG("trace off...\n");
@@ -1180,11 +1192,16 @@ static void trace_onreq_out(struct cell *t, int type, struct tmcb_params *ps)
if(sip_trace_prepare(msg) < 0)
return;
- if(ps->send_buf.len > 0) {
- sto.body = ps->send_buf;
+ if (unlikely(type == TMCB_E2ECANCEL_IN)) {
+ sto.body.s = msg->buf;
+ sto.body.len = msg->len;
} else {
- sto.body.s = "No request buffer";
- sto.body.len = sizeof("No request buffer") - 1;
+ if(ps->send_buf.len > 0) {
+ sto.body = ps->send_buf;
+ } else {
+ sto.body.s = "No request buffer";
+ sto.body.len = sizeof("No request buffer") - 1;
+ }
}
sto.callid = msg->callid->body;
@@ -1245,7 +1262,16 @@ static void trace_onreq_out(struct cell *t, int type, struct tmcb_params *ps)
}
}
- sto.dir = "out";
+ /* FIXME the callback is designed for outgoing requests but this along with
+ * the callback registration at the begining of the function it's for a special
+ * case - incoming CANCEL transactions; they were not traced before; TMCB_E2ECANCEL_IN
+ * will throw the incoming request through this function and the callback in the beginning
+ * will make sure the reply for this cancel is caught */
+ if (unlikely(type == TMCB_E2ECANCEL_IN)) {
+ sto.dir = "in";
+ } else {
+ sto.dir = "out";
+ }
sto.fromtag = get_from(msg)->tag_value;
sto.totag = get_to(msg)->tag_value;
@@ -1361,13 +1387,18 @@ static void trace_onreply_out(struct cell *t, int type, struct tmcb_params *ps)
return;
}
memset(&sto, 0, sizeof(siptrace_data_t));
- if(traced_user_avp.n != 0)
- sto.avp = search_first_avp(traced_user_avp_type, traced_user_avp,
- &sto.avp_value, &sto.state);
- if((sto.avp == NULL) && trace_is_off(t->uas.request)) {
- LM_DBG("trace off...\n");
- return;
+ /* can't(don't know) set FL_SIPTRACE flag from trace_onreq_out because
+ * there no access to CANCEL transaction there */
+ if (likely(type != TMCB_RESPONSE_READY)) {
+ if(traced_user_avp.n != 0)
+ sto.avp = search_first_avp(traced_user_avp_type, traced_user_avp,
+ &sto.avp_value, &sto.state);
+
+ if((sto.avp == NULL) && trace_is_off(t->uas.request)) {
+ LM_DBG("trace off...\n");
+ return;
+ }
}
req = ps->req;
@@ -1463,7 +1494,6 @@ static void trace_onreply_out(struct cell *t, int type, struct tmcb_params *ps)
static void trace_tm_neg_ack_in(struct cell *t, int type, struct tmcb_params *ps)
{
LM_DBG("storing negative ack...\n");
-
/* this condition should not exist but there seems to be a BUG in kamailio
* letting requests other than the ACK inside */
if (ps->req->first_line.u.request.method_value != METHOD_ACK) {
@@ -1623,6 +1653,11 @@ static void trace_transaction(sip_msg_t* msg, siptrace_info_t* info, int registe
LM_ERR("can't register trace_onreply_in\n");
return;
}
+
+ if(tmb.register_tmcb(msg, 0, TMCB_E2ECANCEL_IN, trace_onreq_out, info, 0) <= 0) {
+ LM_ERR("can't register trace_onreply_in\n");
+ return;
+ }
}
//static void trace_dialog(sip_msg_t* msg, siptrace_info_t* info)
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list