[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] define flag_t as unsigned long (#1288)

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

The purpose of that t_flush_flags() is documented:

  * https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tmx.html#tmx.f.t_flush_flags

The role was to push the flags set after t_newtran() to transaction. If that is not happening/is not needed for what so ever reason, needs to be sorted out in a way or another.

The behaviour can stay as it is, with or without any new parameter -- this is going to be discussed. But again, it doesn't belong here, the issue we discuss is with flushing the flags after t_newtrans() and should be done in a single place. The xflags will follow whatever is decided for t_flush_flags(), but right now xflags works as it is expected based on docs for t_flush_flags().

Let's discuss further on #1490 and get the two work the same in a properly documented behaviour.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1288#issuecomment-378844680
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20180405/3d56be0f/attachment.html>