[sr-dev] Crash bug

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 19/03/15 22:20, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 05:18 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19/03/15 22:16, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> On 03/19/2015 05:13 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does it happen that you create the transaction for INVITE with
>>>> t_newtran(), then add/remove headers and after that call t_suspend()?
>>>
>>> Yes, although both the t_newtran() call and any header manipulation
>>> happens after t_continue().
>> But then is No -- t_continue() should be after t_suspend().
>
> Indeed, it is. If you're asking if anything happens between
> t_suspend() and t_continue(), the answer is no. All further processing
> occurs after the rtimer thread dequeues and t_continues the transaction.
>
I asked about what happens before t_suspend() -- if you have there
t_newtran() and then some header/msg changes.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com