[sr-dev] mohqueue docs and suggestions

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 10/2/13 3:54 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> A few comments:
>
> I think the module name should be "queue". The moh-part is a just a nice way of handling the queue...
I don't like "queue" alone, because it is not suggestive for the 
functionality. It can be callqueue or something else that contains queue 
if the current name is no longer preferred, but not just 'queue'.

Cheers,
Daniel
>
>  From reading the docs:
>
> - The example on 3.4. moh_maxcalls illustrates usage of mohdir.
>
> - Change "from the main (request) route" to "a request route". Routes can call routes.
>
> I would love for this module to expose the queue in an xavp (as an alternative to the database) so I can manipulate weights and stuff. Queues need management. I would also like to be able to pick a call out of the queue at any point, regardless of position. But that's a future change. This is a very good contribution.
>
> I don't think naming audio files after payload number is a good scheme. Payload numbers are dynamic for all new codecs and one should use the name tags. I think we should simply copy the file name extensions used by Asterisk for the codecs, like "alaw" for alaw. Or the names used in rtpmap. One of them - but not the numbers, that is not extensible enough as they are no longer assigned. Opus will not get a fixed number, just a name tag.
>
> /O
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28; Miami, Nov 18-20, 2013
   - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20131002/a8af48fb/attachment.html>