[sr-dev] Why doesn't Kamailio handler x-NAT field ?

Khoa Pham onmyway133 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 13:37:53 CET 2013


@Simon

Yes, when either caller or callee is behind symmetric NAT, I want to
activate RTP proxy. I think that makes sense


On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault at viagenie.ca
> wrote:

> Le 2013-03-05 13:20, Alex Balashov a écrit :
>
>  Many router out there are using Full cone NAT.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but how does full cone NAT change the treatment you must give to
>> the SIP client on the far (proxy) end?
>>
>
> I guess he wants to activate RTP proxying for clients behind a symmetric
> NAT only.
>
> Simon
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**dev<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev>
>



-- 
Khoa Pham
HCMC University of Science
Faculty of Information Technology
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20130305/438bec32/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the sr-dev mailing list