[sr-dev] Why doesn't Kamailio handler x-NAT field ?

Simon Perreault simon.perreault at viagenie.ca
Tue Mar 5 13:37:15 CET 2013


Le 2013-03-05 13:20, Alex Balashov a écrit :
>> Many router out there are using Full cone NAT.
>
> Yes, but how does full cone NAT change the treatment you must give to
> the SIP client on the far (proxy) end?

I guess he wants to activate RTP proxying for clients behind a symmetric 
NAT only.

Simon



More information about the sr-dev mailing list