[sr-dev] RPC and XMLRPC

[Jason Penton]

Hi Daniel,

Yes, the RPC API does support nested struct, but at first glance the XMLRPC
doesn't. The sercmd test you did will work so long as you use named pipe
transport. If you try and do a ul.dump using XMLRPC you will get an error
on the nested structure fmt "{". I will have a look at it today and let you
know.

Cheers
Jason

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hello,
>
> xmrpc is not going to be deprecated, it is actually the newer one.
>
> But it is implementation from scratch, no external xmlrpc being used. So
> far it was implemented as much as it was needed. However, nested structures
> in replies should be supported. What is exactly the error you get? If there
> is an issue, it has to be fixed.
>
> I just tested 'sercmd ul.dump' and worked fine, returning:
>
> {
>     Domain: location
>     Size: 512
>     AoRs: {
>         AoR: 401
>         HashID: 3325474
>         Contacts: {
>             Contact: {
>                 Address: sip:401 at 192.168.178.22:1024;line=1uxhrhwy
>                 Expires: 3541
>                 Q: 0.000000
>                 Call-ID: 3c267033369e-d3i5csinl2h7
>                 CSeq: 6300
>                 User-Agent: snom370/8.4.35
>                 Received: [not set]
>                 Path: [not set]
>                 State: CS_NEW
>                 Flags: 0
>                 CFlags: 0
>                 Socket: udp:192.168.178.21:5060
>                 Methods: 6111
>                 Ruid: uloc-4fb17657-71d-1
>                 Instance: <urn:uuid:3d1a0962-4751-426f-8492-0004132672E3>
>                 Reg-Id: 1
>             }
>         }
>     }
>     Stats: {
>         Records: 1
>         Max-Slots: 1
>     }
> }
>
> It has lot of inner structures.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>
> On 5/14/12 5:14 PM, Jason Penton wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>  I have just been testing xmlrpc on some of the IMS module RPC functions
> and got some errors using nested structures. viz "{". Having a quick look
> through the xmlrpc code show that it doesn't support nested structures in
> the reply.
>
>  I am quite happy to fix this but am surprised that nobody has mentioned
> this before as I see there are a few modules that use nested replies. Does
> this maybe mean that XMLRPC is going to be deprecated (not a usual module)?
>
>
>  Cheers
> Jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing listsr-dev at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20120515/66877258/attachment-0001.htm>