[sr-dev] Yum repos for Fedora

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

thanks for providing the repo. I guess the users community will be also 
interested in such info, maybe the email should be forwarded on sr-users 
ML as well.

I will make a news of it on the web site soon to spread the word.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 6/3/12 7:32 PM, Peter Dunkley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been playing around with setting up my own yum repo for Kamailio on
> CentOS (and other Enterprise Linux distributions) and Fedora.
>
> I currently have packages for 3.3.0-pre3 (as of git master from yesterday)
> for CentOS 6 i386, x86_64 and Fedora 17 arm, i386, x86_64.
>
> I plan to update these when Kamailio 3.3.0 is released.
>
> The repo is currently hosted on Dropbox (go to
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9300853/yum/index.html for instructions on how to
> use the repo).
>
> I hope people find this useful and I'd appreciate any feedback/comments if
> there are problems with it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
> PS. If anyone knows of a better (free) place to host the repo than Dropbox
> please let me know.
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> getting it in Fedora will be very useful to spread it easier. If anyone
>> can spend some time for it, will be great!
>>
>> I just wanted to say that I am currently using opensuse build service to
>> build all kind of rpms for kamailio (opensuse, centos, fedora, ...).
>> They have mirrors for distribution, kamailio project for v3.2 is:
>>
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kamailio32&project=home%3Akamailio%3Atelephony
>>
>> All rpms are built based on a custom spec that allow switches based on
>> distro. Not being a rpm user, I just disabled the packages that do not
>> compile in various OS-es and had no quick/obvious fix.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 5/7/12 9:42 PM, Peter Dunkley wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> FedoraProject.org ? :)
>>>> No really - why not to import it directly into the Fedora repos? All
>>>> you need is to register itself and fill so-called "Review Request"
>>>> (for inclusion). I can help with this.
>>>>
>>> This sounds good, but I have a couple of questions about this...
>>> - What are the testing requirements for Fedora?  I am happy to keep the
>>> .spec file up-to-date, test install the RPMs, and do a sanity-check run
>>> of
>>> Kamailio (for the architectures I need).  However, I don't have the time
>>> to do (or interest in doing) any more intensive testing of the RPMs than
>>> that (or on other architectures).
>>> - Won't the differences between the Fedora and Kamailio release cycles
>>> mean that the RPMs in Fedora are always out-of-date?  For example, it is
>>> too late to get Kamailio 3.3.0 (which isn't released yet) into Fedora
>>> 17,
>>> so that will have to wait until Fedora 18.  Kamailio 3.4.0 may become
>>> available between F18 and F19, and if it does it won't be available in
>>> the
>>> F18 repos.
>>>
>>> With a specific repo it would be possible for people to keep up-to-date
>>> with Kamailio if they want (which is what I am personally interested in
>>> anyway).
>>>
>>> That said, as long as it isn't too much extra work I am happy to help
>>> with
>>> getting Kamailio into Fedora - but I'd still think some
>>> dedicated/up-to-date repo would be useful too.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sr-dev mailing list
>>> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw