[sr-dev] IMS extensions

[Olle E. Johansson]

10 dec 2012 kl. 10:28 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:

> Hello,
> 
> yes, it is ok to add a new internal library, this kind of component is exactly for this purpose of sharing code easier between modules. Docs for libs are for developers, not many of them have anyhow.
...which is no excuse for not writing it in Doxygen-formatted comments!!!

More docs mean it becomes easier for new developers which will mean a better product.

Signed
The Kamailio Documentation Department

/O ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 
> On 12/10/12 9:14 AM, Jason Penton wrote:
>> Also, for now we will not have time to document the library, but this will not be necessary from a user's perspective.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jason Penton <jason.penton at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey Daniel,
>> 
>> we are going to put the IMS extensions in this week so we are working on the docs at the moment. However, one quick question:
>> 
>> 1. We have used a library of accessors (things we do across various modules) for IMS-specific stuff for example, ims_get_impu, etc. Are you okay with us adding another library called "ims", similar to kcore, kmi, etc?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Jason
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sr-dev mailing list
>> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
> 
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20121210/a1e7a3d5/attachment.htm>