[sr-dev] IMS extensions

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

yes, it is ok to add a new internal library, this kind of component is 
exactly for this purpose of sharing code easier between modules. Docs 
for libs are for developers, not many of them have anyhow.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12/10/12 9:14 AM, Jason Penton wrote:
> Also, for now we will not have time to document the library, but this 
> will not be necessary from a user's perspective.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Jason Penton <jason.penton at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jason.penton at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hey Daniel,
>
>     we are going to put the IMS extensions in this week so we are
>     working on the docs at the moment. However, one quick question:
>
>     1. We have used a library of accessors (things we do across
>     various modules) for IMS-specific stuff for example, ims_get_impu,
>     etc. Are you okay with us adding another library called "ims",
>     similar to kcore, kmi, etc?
>
>     Cheers
>     Jason
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20121210/09d8c5b5/attachment.htm>