[sr-dev] problem with tracking master

[Juha Heinanen]

Alex Hermann writes:

> Is local mtree branch supposed to track master?
...
> From the above commands, I don't see why it should. Local branch jh tracks 
> origin/jh/mtree, not master. So why would a master change suddenly appear in 
> the jh branch? I would expect changes you push to origin/jh/mtree to
> appear in your local jh branch after a pull, nothing else.

if jh/mtree tracks master (as it according to the wiki page is supposed
to do) and when jh tracks remote branch jh/mtree, then according to
normal logic it follows that also jh tracks master.

-- juha