[sr-dev] RFC 5626 (Outbound) planned?

Martin Hoffmann martin.hoffmann at telio.ch
Mon Oct 10 15:42:27 CEST 2011


Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> 
> > Forget the two ob proxies if you want. The rest of the specification
> > is the best answer for NAT and TCP/TLS, much better than the
> > half-solutions we use today (those that makes the registrar to mantain
> > 40 bindings for the same AoR when the device is a movile using SIP
> > over TCP and reconnects every few minutes).
> 
> i don't have anything against that when ua registers it tells its unique
> id so that registrar can discard the old ones.
> 
> what i was trying to say that outbound does not bring any help to
> implementing redundant sip infrastructure, where two active proxies
> could have worked together each with its own ip address.

Do I understand you correctly that you want to use a set of edge proxies
plus a set of registrars and it should create connections to all edge
proxies and then register with all registrars via each of these
connections?

Regards,
Martin



More information about the sr-dev mailing list