[sr-dev] Headers for IMS Extensions

[Jason Penton]

Hey Ovidiu

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com> wrote:

> If the headers must be accessible by several modules, then it would
> make sense to have them into existing framework.
> One option would be to enable some compile flags and compile that code
> only for IMS (similar to FLAVOUR - we could add a new flavour)
>

don't know if I would go so far as to call it another 'flavour'
(semantically), but yes compile flags may be the way to go......


>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Jason Penton <jason.penton at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I wanted to ask the community what the best way forward is for
> incorporating
> > new SIP (IMS specific) headers into Kamailio. Right now I see two ways:
> > 1. incorporating into existing parser framework in Kamailio
> > 2. Leave it up to individual modules to independently parse for
> appropriate
> > IMS headers.
> > I would think 1 would be the best option?
> > Here are some examples of the extension headers:
> >
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Communications_Platform/5.0/html/SIP_Servlets_Server_User_Guide/sect-SIP_and_IMS_Extensions.html#tab-IMS_P-Header_Extensions
> > Cheers
> > Jason
> > _______________________________________________
> > sr-dev mailing list
> > sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20111102/b11f45a3/attachment.htm>