[sr-dev] more fixups in mod_fix.h or what?

[Juha Heinanen]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

 > mod_fix.h should be used if there are more than one module using that 
 > fixup, otherwise makes no sense, the fixup should stay in the module.
 > 
 > Using type of parameter in name of function does not scale anymore, so a 
 > different name pattern should be chosen. Can be developer choice, 
 > preferably suggestive if possible.

how about a new scheme, where in exports module writer lists the
fixups in an arg string, for example,

{"test", (cmd_function)test, "pvar,str,spve", REQUEST_ROUTE |
FAILURE_ROUTE},

names in the arg string can be well known (in which case nothing else
needs to be done by module writer) or custom (in which case the
corresponding fixup needs to be written by module writer).

-- juha