[sr-dev] personal summary of what still needs to be done
Juha Heinanen
jh at tutpro.com
Sat Sep 19 16:04:00 CEST 2009
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
> sip-router handles 6xx in the rfc way (cancels all branches on which no
> reply was received and stops forking). This should be equivalent to
> disable_6xx_block=0.
>
> However one can override it, by simply adding branches in the failure
> route (the ideea being that if you add a branch in the failure route,
> you know what you're doing an you want forking re-enabled). If I understand
> correctly this is mostly equivalent to disable_6xx_block=1, at least for
> the voicemail scenario.
>
> Am I correct in assuming that we don't need it, because sr handles this
> automatically?
see inaki's reply.
-- juha
More information about the sr-dev
mailing list