[sr-dev] personal summary of what still needs to be done

Juha Heinanen jh at tutpro.com
Sat Sep 19 16:04:00 CEST 2009


Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:

 > sip-router handles 6xx in the rfc way (cancels all branches on which no
 > reply was received and stops forking). This should be equivalent to 
 >  disable_6xx_block=0.
 > 
 > However one can override it, by simply adding branches in the failure
 > route (the ideea being that if you add a branch in the failure route,
 > you know what you're doing an you want forking re-enabled). If I understand
 > correctly this is mostly equivalent to disable_6xx_block=1, at least for 
 > the voicemail scenario.
 > 
 > Am I correct in assuming that we don't need it, because sr handles this
 > automatically?

see inaki's reply.

-- juha



More information about the sr-dev mailing list