[sr-dev] SER crash : Segmentation fault

[inge]

Hi Andrei,

Thank you for this detailed answer.

Indeed, update to 0.9.7 will be more easier than SER 2.0. Our priority
is to avoid a lot of bugs. 

We are not able to reproduce the crash...so we'll see. Probably we will
do an update to 0.9.7.

Regards,

Adrien


Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 13:11 +0200, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul a
écrit :
> On Sep 04, 2009 at 18:06, inge <inge at legos.fr> wrote:
> > Hello Andrei,
> > 
> > I wonder what is involved in migration to SER 2.0 versus 0.9.5. I read
> > that UID is used now to identify the users instead of username for
> > example, so we can anticipate impacts on internal processes and SERWeb.
> 
> Yes, uid and did (for domains) are now used internally.
> There is a script which might help in migrating a database:
> http://www.iptel.org/ser/migrate_db
> 
> > 
> > Can I find a detailed list which these changelog ?
> 
> Try
> http://www.iptel.org/basic_changes_in_configuration_file_0
> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=blob;f=ser/NEWS;h=02543746
> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=blob;f=ser/ChangeLog;h=f97521
> 
> I don't remember exactly, hopefully there is a more complete migration
> guide somewhere (maybe somebody else can help if I missed anything).
> > 
> > Is it not more reasonnable to migrate in 0.9.7? Mainly to solve our
> > initial bug with Seg Fault and optionnaly to have new features.
> 
> Yes, in your case migration to 0.9.7 should be painless (there are no
> config or db changes, only bugfixes, so you wouldn't need to change
> anything).
> 
> Andrei