[sr-dev] command name sercmd hardwired in Makefile

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 07/01/2009 07:50 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>  > I do not think every utility has to be renamed. Anyhow there are kamctl 
>  > and serctl that do different things and they have to be kept. 
>
> i'm not asking renaming of all utilities.  in fact, i'm not asking to
> rename any, but a POSSIBILITY to configure the name of serctl that deals
> with core and should thus be independent from ser or kamailio.
>   
btw, I forgot to mention, if by asking a possibility to configure the 
name for binary, tools, etc. you mean that you will implement and submit 
a patch when it is the case, that is very fine, improvements are welcome 
always.

What I wanted to say is that I do not want replacing defaults with other 
static names now. And I won't put efforts in such things before we get 
to testing phase for new relase.

Daniel

>  > Also 
>  > rtpproxy was in the cvs repository as a related project, so keeping this 
>  > kind of related tools with different names should be fine. Related are 
>  > also serweb, sems, etc ... sticking to current name is better imo.
>
> all those you list are not mandatory for managing of the core like
> serctl is and i don't care how they are named.  if you want to stick to
> ser ralated name of serctl, then do so, but don't force everyone else
> to do the same.
>
> -- juha
>   

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/