[sr-dev] AVPs in replies?

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 12/10/09 1:08 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>   >  t_on_reply("1"); - run onreply_route[1] with no locking (default, same
>   >  syntax as now) for current transaction.
>   >  t_on_reply("1", "0"); - run onreply_route[1] with no locking for current
>   >  transaction.
>   >  t_on_reply("1", "1"); -  run onreply_route[1] under lock for current
>   >  transaction.
>
> fine, if t_on_reply("1") is equal to t_on_reply("1", "1").  this is very
> important for backwards compatibility and error prevention.
> t_on_reply("1", "0") is then for optimization purpose.
>    
that was a proposal. Maybe others can have different opinions. I need 
this option in several cases, not that often. Note that in K it is by 
default off. So in case you do not have set the tm parameter 
onreply_avp_mode to 1, then it is eqiuvalent of  t_on_reply("1", "0").

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/