[sr-dev] AVPs in replies?

[Juha Heinanen]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

 > t_on_reply("1"); - run onreply_route[1] with no locking (default, same 
 > syntax as now) for current transaction.
 > t_on_reply("1", "0"); - run onreply_route[1] with no locking for current 
 > transaction.
 > t_on_reply("1", "1"); -  run onreply_route[1] under lock for current 
 > transaction.

fine, if t_on_reply("1") is equal to t_on_reply("1", "1").  this is very
important for backwards compatibility and error prevention.
t_on_reply("1", "0") is then for optimization purpose.

-- juha