[sr-dev] About SIP and TEL uri in SR

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2009/8/6 Jan Janak <jan at ryngle.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo<ibc at aliax.net> wrote:
>> 2009/8/6 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
>>>> At the same time, we could implement support for other URI's, like XMPP
>>>> since we have an xmpp gateway.
>>>
>>> Yes, should be generic as RFC 3261 which allows all kind of URIs
>>
>> Well, I can't agree. A SIP proxy shouldn't implement a HTTP URI in a
>> request, or a mailto URI, even if RFC 3261 says "any URI".
>
> Why not?
>
>> AFAIK the only URI's to implement wouuld be:
>> - SIP
>> - SIPS
>> - TEL
>> - URN
>
> Why URN yes and HTTP not?


According to some exotic RFC, a proxy should handle a URN URI and
translate it into a SIP URI (or route the request to a predefined
proxy which handles it). But no specification defines how a HTTP URI
should be translated into a SIP URI (or other kind of URI).

But if SR impements HTTP perfect, then I'll configure a SR as HTTP
proxy and load balancer XDD



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>