[sr-dev] About SIP and TEL uri in SR

Jan Janak jan at ryngle.com
Thu Aug 6 15:12:26 CEST 2009


On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo<ibc at aliax.net> wrote:
> 2009/8/6 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
>>> At the same time, we could implement support for other URI's, like XMPP
>>> since we have an xmpp gateway.
>>
>> Yes, should be generic as RFC 3261 which allows all kind of URIs
>
> Well, I can't agree. A SIP proxy shouldn't implement a HTTP URI in a
> request, or a mailto URI, even if RFC 3261 says "any URI".

Why not?

> AFAIK the only URI's to implement wouuld be:
> - SIP
> - SIPS
> - TEL
> - URN

Why URN yes and HTTP not?

   Jan.



More information about the sr-dev mailing list