[Serdev] serctl bug??

[Jiri Kuthan]

You are right -- there is a year 2003 bug :). The value has been already 
increased on CVS. On development version, Jan introduced a new fifo command
which allows to set infinite time explicitly.

-jiri

At 02:53 PM 1/12/2004, Chuck Ramirez wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I was trying to add an alias using serctl, but the
>binding is expiring just after its addition. 
>
>I checked serctl and it seems that the expire being
>used is:
># expiration time for alias table
>FOREVER='2020-05-28 21:32:15'
>FOREVER_REL=1073741823
>
>Looking at the source code, I saw that this
>FOREVEL_REL is addded to the timestamp of the current
>time, right?
>
>I guess that this addition is actually going beyond
>the limits of time.h. Is this assumption right? The
>2038 year bug?
>
>I think the value of FOREVER_REL should be decreased
>in all versions.
>
>Thanks a lot!
>
>Chuck.
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
>http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serdev mailing list
>serdev at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/