[Kamailio-Devel] dropping 200ok?

[Klaus Darilion]

btw: I do not care about reboots during the transaction. Reboots should 
happen not that often.

The reason I want to drop replies without matching transactions is that 
the proxy can be abused as relay.

regards
klaus

Klaus Darilion schrieb:
> This is somehtin gI like to since years.
> 
> Check reply and if there is no matching transcation I want to drop it 
> (regardsless of the response code)
> 
> For this "drop" must work for every response code
> 
> regards
> klaus
> 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> wondering if makes sense to drop 200ok, maybe other final replies, too.
>>
>> Discussing with some folks around, the following use case came up:
>>
>> INVITE
>> restart
>> 200ok
>>
>> Due to restart, INVITE transaction in memory is lost, therefore proper 
>> accounting is compromised.
>>
>> The 200OK is going just fine based on Via and call completes. In this 
>> situation, something like:
>>
>> onreply_route {
>>     if(!t_check_trans())
>>     {
>>         drop;
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> could protect. Is anyone seeing side effects or workarounds at least for 
>> accounting? Have in mind that the INVITE might have been redirected, so 
>> From/To headers might not be relevant for who should pay.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel